CLICK on a thumbnail to access the larger image.
If you find the text
too small, press Ctrl+ [The Ctrl key
and the plus sign simultaneously] and the page will magnify. Pressing
Ctrl and zero together will reset the page to normal.
CLICK on a thumbnail to access the larger image.
THIS scary-looking bunch is the Ross family, photograph kindly provided by Chelsea Hawkins. Judging from the size of baby Edward, it was taken in about 1860, possibly in Lahore. Left to Right: Elizabeth Jennings Ross (1855-1892), John James Rosse (1810-1884), John Sperrin Ross (1853-1897), Jane Matilda Ross née Sperrin (1816-1885), Edward Parsons Ross (1858-1921), Sarah Jane Ross (1856-1881), and (probably) James Mines Sperrin Matthews (1847-). | THIS tiny photograph (the thumbnail image is twice the size of the real thing) of James and Jane Ealey (née Ashby) was inside the locket worn by Jane as seen here. Whether before or after her death, the locket came into the possession of her son, Daniel, and then to his daughter, who discovered the picture inside. It could be a wedding portrait, which would date it to 1875. | JANE Ealey (née Ashby) and her son, Daniel. Aged about two? That would date the photograph to around 1882. He doesn't seem very happy about being togged up and told to stand still does he? Jane is wearing the locket again, and you can see the chain (now lost) more clearly. A very weighty affair, more like a metal collar than a cord. | DANIEL Ealey (Left) with an unknown companion, in Simla. The photograph is undated, but his army papers show him in Simla during the summer months of 1905, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1911, 1912, and 1917. He isn't wearing a uniform here, but seems to have got smartened up for a special occasion. Somebody's wedding, perhaps? | ONE of Daniel Ealey's sequence of photographs taken during the Delhi Durbar of December 1911, at which he was present. That seems to be King George and Queen Mary in the carriage, but they're not in their coronation robes, so this must be one of the other ceremonies. The whole thing lasted from the 7th to the 16th of December. There is a wonderful fragment of early colour film showing the Royal Review of troops here. |
THIS group picture is pasted onto the back of the photograph of Jane Ealey (née Ashby), without any accompanying description. So it is linked in a very physical way with the Ealey/Ross side of the family. The lady on the right looks to be dressed in 1915-ish mode? Daniel Ealey had been in India for many years by this time and, of course, Mabel Ross was born there. Both spent summers in Simla. I can't place any of the faces, though the harrumphing little girl, front row, second from left, could be me plonked there from the Tardis. The scanner has made rainbows out of the hat brims and hems, but I like that. | A scan of a scan, so not the best quality. This unnamed photo was found with other Ealey photographs. The gentleman bears a resemblance to Daniel and the clothing looks post-WWI. When you look at the circumstances of each of Daniel's siblings around this time, George is the best fit. Also, the gentleman and lady look like younger versions of an already-identified elderly George and Amy, and the little girl looks like a younger version of an already-identified elderly Ivy. Tentatively then, L-R George Charles Ealey (1909-1982), George Ealey (1878-1962), Amy Louisa Ealey (née Workman, 1888-1946), & Ivy Mary Ealey (1912-1997). If anyone out there knows better, please let me know. | MICHAEL St. Leger D'Cruz and Susan Adaline Pinniger, photograph kindly provided by Susan's grand-daughters, Margaret and Pamela, and published with permission. We have no pictures of Susan's sister, Great-grandmother Dorothy, so it's interesting to imagine how the sisters might have resembled each other. Michael was a driver on the NorthWest Railway, India, where his brother-in-law worked as a guard.. | ||
Home | Lines | Dates | Search | Contact | Sitemap | GalleryRandom Page last edited 29 October 2018 10:21 |