THE DESCENDANTS OF JOHN SPERRIN

SUIA

ALL descendancy charts follow the surname only and exclude people born within the last hundred years.

• Linked names will take you to the chart for that surname, with the focused person at the top of the page...

Unless the linked name is at the top of the tree, in which case, you'll land back on the chart of direct ancestors.

• Hovering over a name, date or event should reveal brief source information.

SUIA

AGAIN, thanks are due here to Chelsea Hawkins, who introduced me to the Sperrins and pointed out the resemblance between our old, unnamed, family portrait and the lady in the Hawkins family photograph of Jane Matilda, husband John and children.*


Jane Matilda SPERRINJohn SPERRIN. 76th Regiment of Foot 1804; 24th Native Infantry 1814; Conductor East India Company Army 1819.
+Sarah, born about 1772; died 27 Nov 1837 Jhossee, near Karnal.

├── Ann SPERRIN, born 11 Dec 1804, baptised Kanpur.

├── Mary SPERRIN, born about 1809.
+1) Philip Valentine MINES, married 27 Jan 1825 Meerut; died before 1849. Overseer,
Sergeant in the East India Company Army.
+2) James CHRISTIE, born about 1811; married 12 Oct 1849 Simla.

├── Emily SPERRIN, born about 1811; married 16 Nov 1827 Agra.
+Stewart FITZGERALD, born about 1797. Sergeant-Major 5th Cavalry.

├── Sarah SPERRIN, born 22 Jan 1814, baptised Kanpur.

└── Jane Matilda SPERREN, born 15 Mar 1816, baptised Meerut; died 27 Aug 1885 Peshawar.
+1) James Alfred WOODWARD, born about 1806; married 18 Oct 1829 Allyghur ; buried 15 April 1841 Landour. Quartermaster Sergeant, 32nd Native
Infantry.

+2) John MATTHEWS, born about 1816; married 27 May 1846 Kussowlie; died 18 Jun 1848
Kussowlie
. Apothecary, 29th Regiment.

+3) John James ROSSE; baptised 5 Jul 1810 Kanpur; married 31 Aug 1852 Kussowlie; died 27 Nov 1884, buried Lahore.

 * The portrait, painted in Simla by W. Melville in 1845, belonged to my grandmother, Mabel Ross, so it had to be from the Ross/Tailor root of the family and, as the Tailors were still in England at the time it was painted, the Ross side seemed likelier. But that was as much as we could say until Chelsea provided the further clue of the photograph, and Jane Matilda's entry onto the scene with her three marriages. Aside from the likeness between the lady in the portrait and the lady in the photograph, Chelsea also pointed out that the youth in the photograph had similar features to the gentleman in the companion portrait, and could possibly be his son. If you take the resemblances and all the dates into consideration—first husband James's death in 1841, the portrait's creation in 1845, Jane and John Matthews' marriage in 1846, young James' birth in 1847, and John Matthews' death the following year—a plausible identification can be made.

A further clue is the fact that the lady's portrait is more degraded around the edges than the gentleman's, as if it had been handled and/or been out on display for longer. This would have been the case with Jane, who outlived her second husband and went on to marry for a third time. It is plausible that her portrait continued to be displayed, whereas her second husband's would have been put away and kept safer from the ravages of light and air.